Example
WAVE, 2013 </br> 50×70 cm, tempera on canvas WAVE 2, 2013 </br> 50×70 cm, tempera on canvas STEP, 2013 </br> 50×70 cm, tempera on canvas ROPE, 2013 </br> 50×70 cm, tempera on canvas CLOUD, 2013 </br> 40×60 cm, tempera on panel DURABILITY, 2014 </br> 50×60 cm, tempera on panel BLOW, 2013 </br> 50×70 cm, tempera on canvas LEAKAGE, 2013 </br> 40×60 cm, tempera on panel SLIP, 2014 </br> 50×60 cm, tempera on panel DUST, 2014 </br> 60×80 cm, tempera on canvas PROBE, 2014 </br> 60×80 cm, tempera on canvas VOLATILIZATION, 2013 </br> 50×70 cm, tempera on canvas SMOKE, 2014 </br> 60×80 cm, tempera on canvas IGNITION, 2014 </br> 60×80 cm, tempera on canvas CLOUD 2, 2014 </br> 40×60 cm, tempera on panel OUTFLOW, 2014 </br> 50×70 cm, tempera on canvas CENTER, 2014 </br> 50×60 cm, tempera on panel DUST, 2014 </br> 40×60 cm, tempera on panel SOFTNESS, 2014 </br> 40×50 cm, tempera on canvas FRAGILITY, 2014 </br> 50×70 cm, tempera on panel TRIANGLE, 2014 </br> 40×60 cm, tempera on panel SYMMETRY, 2014 </br> 50×100 cm, tempera on panel CUSTOM, 2014 </br> 30×90 cm, tempera on canvas TRANSMUTATION 1, 2014 </br> 30×90 cm, tempera on panel ERROR 1, 2014 </br> 40×50 cm, tempera on canvas ERROR 2, 2014 </br> 40×50 cm, tempera on canvas TRANSMUTATION 3, 2014 </br> 40×50 cm, tempera on canvas TRANSMUTATION 2, 2014 </br> 40×50 cm, tempera on panel BLAST II, 2014 </br> 70×100 cm, tempera on panel BLAST IV, 2015 </br> 70×100 cm, tempera on panel SYMMETRY II , 2014 </br> 50×100 cm, tempera on panel BLAST III, 2014 </br> 50×100 cm, tempera on panel SYMMETRY, 2014 </br> 50×100 cm, tempera on panel DISPLACEMENT III, 2015 </br> 50×70 cm, tempera on canvas DISPLACEMENT II, 2015 </br> 50×40 cm, tempera on canvas DISPLACEMENT, 2014 </br> 50×40 cm, tempera on canvas
This is another cycle after the Experiment cycle, which is related with the issue of scientific knowledge, experiment status, and all processes, in which we try to coordinate the results of logical reasoning with sensual observation – to make personal experiences neutral and to generalise them.
For a long time now science has been spectacularly successful, making it possible to control the invisible forces such as electricity, gravity and other energies, to a greater extent. Today the knowledge of the world overawe us again. Quantum mechanics and uncertainty theory, though compatible with calculation, and even partially certified by observation, argue with common sense and its positivist attitude towards science.

The deeper into reality structure we get, the more fluid, the less stable and predictable its construction appears to be. The concepts that were buried long time ago as absurd ones regain their validity: if events do not exist on quantum level as long as they do not become objects of observation, George Berkeley was right when he absolutised perception: esse est percipi. The compartmentalised structure of reality reveals further grades of confusion and complication with each next level, and science, which was supposed to “define” the world, dematerialises it more and more by reaching phenomena that contradict common-sense “truths”.